Describe the concept of Moral Relativism Essay

You have no right to tell me what to do and What is genuine for you is non true for me atomic number 18 great examples of how we do not al carriages accept the real truth in life and these statements are both examples of relativism. There are four kinds of relativism metaphysical, epistemological, religious and chaste which I am going to talk about. E genuinely choice we check is due to each persons single(a) righteousness.Morality is concerned with the free choice of clear-sighted human organisms, therefore Protagoras shows that there are no moral authoritatives when he said Man is the greenback of all things in accessory moral relativism is the persuasion that godliness does not relate to any absolute standards of right and injure but sizeable and adult are dependent on culture and scene cerebrateing that moral relativism is deontological because it all depends on something creation right and defile.Having a holiness may mean that unalike groups of peck may play assorted versions of football, just like different countries have different legal systems, in addition having a veritable moral could just be chosen by the mood that you are in at that certain(prenominal) time of day because moralities authorized at wholeness time may fail to be accepted at another time. What is it for a group or an individual to have a particular morality? In some ways it is like having a particular language with a particular syntax (The arrangement of words and phrases to create well-formed sentences in a language) and also how we use certain vocabulary.Your morality explains something about the way you act and about the way you react to the actions of others. In my opinion moral relativism is very contradictive and a good example of this would be fairness enforcement within America because we and they say murder is wrong and their solution is to murder the murderer via execution. We say stealth is wrong and then take taxes from people without consent . If soulfulness doesnt pay taxes and even resists then they ordain be judged as being morally wrong even though they are doing moral wrongness themselves.Moving on, normative ethics is the main concept of moral relativism because it is the examination of issues of right and wrong and how people justify the decision they make when faced with concomitants of moral choice an example of this would be the ten commandments because they are a set of rules to stop us from being miss lead in life. In addition a great example of this would be when morality is determined by situations, for example, evasiveness is wrong. But lying to the Nazis where the Jews are is right.Since situations are relative and changing, then morality is relative and changing, however morality is not eer determined by situations but conditioned by it for example murder is wrong, but one must murder someone for self-defence. So therefore this situation makes a proceeding right, Killing for self-defence makes killing not murder. Therefore killing for self-defence is not wrong. Another point people think is true is that good intentions is enough. It is not. Hitler had good intentions, but his actions were not. A good intention can make a deed good, but a good intention does not make a bad deed good.